You're right that it's easy to implement as an abstraction but I was rather thinking about execution speed. I guess a fictional object like [array drip] that would just iterate through the array using a C loop would be the fastest possible method. I don't see how you could even get close to that with abstractions, especially when using only vanilla objects.
> Gesendet: Montag, 05. Oktober 2015 um 14:00 Uhr > Von: "IOhannes m zmoelnig" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [PD] array-abs > > On 2015-10-05 13:25, Christof Ressi wrote: > > I'm only dreaming, but maybe that could be a fantastic feature for a future > > pd > > vanilla release. :-) > > i think it's so easy to implement as an abstraction that *i* think it > should go into supporting libraries (like array-abs). > > mgsdf > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
