Ah, gotcha.
-Jonathan
On Monday, October 5, 2015 11:40 AM, Christof Ressi
<[email protected]> wrote:
You're right that it's easy to implement as an abstraction but I was rather
thinking about execution speed. I guess a fictional object like [array drip]
that would just iterate through the array using a C loop would be the fastest
possible method. I don't see how you could even get close to that with
abstractions, especially when using only vanilla objects.
> Gesendet: Montag, 05. Oktober 2015 um 14:00 Uhr
> Von: "IOhannes m zmoelnig" <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [PD] array-abs
>
> On 2015-10-05 13:25, Christof Ressi wrote:
> > I'm only dreaming, but maybe that could be a fantastic feature for a future
> > pd
> > vanilla release. :-)
>
> i think it's so easy to implement as an abstraction that *i* think it
> should go into supporting libraries (like array-abs).
>
> mgsdf
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
