as far as i know, there aren't any legitimate uses of vanilla objects that generate error messages. I have a pretty huge project, and the only thing i get in the console is:
expr, expr~, fexpr~ version 0.4 under GNU Lesser General Public License ...and even that is just for a gui thing that doesn't go into the final libpd release. But when i used to use pd-extended and its objects, i often got unavoidable warnings - stuff like "xxxx is not compatible with Windows" or whatever...whether you would consider the warning a bug, or the incompatibility a bug, is not something i can answer. what errors are you getting Liam? and with what objects? there very well could be a tidy way to avoid them. On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list < [email protected]> wrote: > What are some of those legitimate uses? > > A legitimate use of an object should not be generating > an error in the first place. So if that is the case it's a bug, > and we should fix it. > > -Jonathan > > > > On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:13 AM, Liam Goodacre <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Is there any way to prevent error messages from printing in the console? I > know they're there for a reason, but there are some legitimate uses of > certain objects that still generate error messages, and it would be nice to > suppress them, at least while the patch is loading. > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
