A simpler thing would be to just have any object that deals with file i/o to return something like an "exit status" on a read or after a write attempt.
As long as we're wishing for stuff, I wish vanilla included the [error] object for proper error handling in abstractions. And a bitwise XOR. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-10-14 12:07, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > On 2015-10-14 09:34, Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> I don't see why [textfile] shouldn't report that to the patch instead of > >> the console. > > > > because it would require a lot of code to be added to all use-cases of > > [ŧextfile] in order to not break the feedback where it is indeed desired > > and needed. > > this should have read: > "because it would require code to be added to all uses of [ŧextfile] > where the error is indeed desired and needed." > > > > > this *could* be done in a way satisfying to both, if Pd had some kind of > > exception handling. > > however, it doesn't. > > > > > > fgamsdr > > IOhannes > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
