It's actually twins. It's a complex situation; I don't yet know which is real and which imaginary.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jaime E Oliver <[email protected]> wrote: > laptop baby > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Matt Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > > I meant 32 points, sorry. You can usually assume I'm typing with a crying > baby in my lap. :) > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:14 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 10/16/2015 03:50 AM, Matt Barber wrote: >> > Basically, for [block~] sizes less than 32 bits, [fft~] doesn't perform >> -- >> > it just passes the signal through unchanged. >> >> isn't that what is expected of a 1 point FFT? (32bits == 4 bytes == >> sizeof(float)). >> >> > See the attached patch, which only shows [fft~]. The saved contents of >> the >> > tables on opening are the results for [block~ 8] on my machine, for >> > quarter-nyquist at 44100. >> >> so you meant 32 bytes (8 samples * 4 bytes each)? >> >> or 32pins aka points (as in [block~ 32])? >> >> gfmrdsa >> IOhannes >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
