Dear Fred, some of the objects proposed by Porres could be added in cyclone? If yes, we can work on them; otherwise I see your todo list[1]. If you confirm this list probably it's better to work to fix bugs.
Cheers, Marco Matteo Markidis [1]: http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/digaud/puredata/cyclone/cycloneToDo.html 2016-02-17 19:33 GMT+01:00 Fred Jan Kraan <[email protected]>: > Hi Alexandre, > > Howdy, if you understand only a part of it, I know that I know about >> nothing. >> >> But hey, as I understand it, there's quite some work to make it (loading >> the weird name objects without [declare]) happen and you'd rather focus >> on other fixes, cool. >> >> Well, I'm just starting using github >> https://github.com/porres/pd-cyclone >> < >> https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fporres%2Fpd-cyclone&h=FAQF6upTy> >> and >> have mobilized others to collaborate with new objects for cyclone, >> according to that list I shared these days. >> >> You may have noticed a pull request already for [pong]. I'm working with >> someone else and we should be having scale / scale~ / atodb / dbtoa / >> atodb~ / dbtoa~ / trunc~ ready quite soon! >> > > Yes, I noticed. I appreciate all you do for pd and cyclone in particular, > but I cannot accept the request. Cyclone is one of the few libraries with a > closed set of objects; only those part of Max/MSP, arbitrary set around > version 4.6 or 5. > > Cyclone is already quite big, with 150+ objects. This seems a good reason > to be selective in which objects should be added. Just because objects are > or should be in Max/MSP is not reason enough. If it exists in another > library, it is unneeded IMHO. > >> >> I can bother myself to try and deal with the issues regarding these >> objects, but I think a start could be to create new objects with the >> unweird names, this is not in conflict with Max compatibility, as it >> also loads these objects via the same way (again, they'd be: >> /greaterthan~ / greaterthaneq~ / lessthan~ / lessthaneq~ / equals~ / >> notequals~ / plusequals~ / rminus~ / rminus / rdiv~ / rdiv / modulo~/). >> It wouldn't get in conflict with current state of cyclone either and the >> help files of these objects could refer to nettles and all. Cool? Later >> on in the game I can try and figure out how to load them without declare. >> > > Personally I have no issue with [declare] as it is vanilla. Or with the > weird names; if you want un-weird names, abstractions (containing [declare] > should work too? > >> >> cheers >> >> cheers >> > > Greetings, > > Fred Jan > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
