Thanks Porres! I'm waiting good news.... Perhaps a cyclone fork, maybe UpCyclone :P
And again.. Thanks every pd/library maintainer for your time of life! Em sáb, 20 de fev de 2016 às 01:51, Alexandre Torres Porres < [email protected]> escreveu: > Thanks for your thoughts and message here, Esteban, but I started a fork > of this thread focusing on updating and including more objects to cyclone : > *[Not > accepting new objects in Cyclone, why not? (was Re: [PD] Nettles)]* > > I plan to respond to you on that thread. > > cheers > > 2016-02-19 23:31 GMT-02:00 Esteban Viveros <[email protected]>: > >> Hello, >> >> First, thanks a lot all of you which are working in this project! I'm >> learning a lot and I have much more to learn because of your work. It is >> very important to me and for those who are coming. Thanks! >> >> Second, I'm pd and Max 7 user, and would like to say which in my point >> of view cyclone is very useful to anyone like me which use pd and max... >> Max 7 are very used for Ableton Live users because Max for Live and a >> library (cyclone) bridging cycling74 platform with pd are a useful tool to >> learn patchs and coffee them with different features offered by each of >> them. And for me is something sad to know that bridge is large outdated, >> and the worse, we have people interested in make the updates to allow >> patches workables in pd (cyclone) and Max and exist the possibility of stay >> with an outdated compatibility. >> Only to reforce, several people I know are working and learning >> max4live, that is Max 7, what seems relevant this update. >> >> This is only my point of view. A user, and I wish contributor too in the >> future. >> >> Cheers >> >> Esteban Viveros >> >> Em qua, 17 de fev de 2016 17:46, Marco Matteo Markidis < >> [email protected]> escreveu: >> >>> Dear Fred, >>> >>> some of the objects proposed by Porres could be added in cyclone? If >>> yes, we can work on them; otherwise I see your todo list[1]. If you confirm >>> this list probably it's better to work to fix bugs. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Marco Matteo Markidis >>> >>> [1]: >>> http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/digaud/puredata/cyclone/cycloneToDo.html >>> >>> 2016-02-17 19:33 GMT+01:00 Fred Jan Kraan <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hi Alexandre, >>>> >>>> Howdy, if you understand only a part of it, I know that I know about >>>>> nothing. >>>>> >>>>> But hey, as I understand it, there's quite some work to make it >>>>> (loading >>>>> the weird name objects without [declare]) happen and you'd rather focus >>>>> on other fixes, cool. >>>>> >>>>> Well, I'm just starting using github >>>>> https://github.com/porres/pd-cyclone >>>>> < >>>>> https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fporres%2Fpd-cyclone&h=FAQF6upTy> >>>>> and >>>>> have mobilized others to collaborate with new objects for cyclone, >>>>> according to that list I shared these days. >>>>> >>>>> You may have noticed a pull request already for [pong]. I'm working >>>>> with >>>>> someone else and we should be having scale / scale~ / atodb / dbtoa / >>>>> atodb~ / dbtoa~ / trunc~ ready quite soon! >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, I noticed. I appreciate all you do for pd and cyclone in >>>> particular, but I cannot accept the request. Cyclone is one of the few >>>> libraries with a closed set of objects; only those part of Max/MSP, >>>> arbitrary set around version 4.6 or 5. >>>> >>>> Cyclone is already quite big, with 150+ objects. This seems a good >>>> reason to be selective in which objects should be added. Just because >>>> objects are or should be in Max/MSP is not reason enough. If it exists in >>>> another library, it is unneeded IMHO. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I can bother myself to try and deal with the issues regarding these >>>>> objects, but I think a start could be to create new objects with the >>>>> unweird names, this is not in conflict with Max compatibility, as it >>>>> also loads these objects via the same way (again, they'd be: >>>>> /greaterthan~ / greaterthaneq~ / lessthan~ / lessthaneq~ / equals~ / >>>>> notequals~ / plusequals~ / rminus~ / rminus / rdiv~ / rdiv / >>>>> modulo~/). >>>>> It wouldn't get in conflict with current state of cyclone either and >>>>> the >>>>> help files of these objects could refer to nettles and all. Cool? Later >>>>> on in the game I can try and figure out how to load them without >>>>> declare. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Personally I have no issue with [declare] as it is vanilla. Or with the >>>> weird names; if you want un-weird names, abstractions (containing [declare] >>>> should work too? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>>> >>>> >>>> Greetings, >>>> >>>> Fred Jan >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> [email protected] mailing list >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
