> if you like your fancy gui's, use them!
Pd's GUI is plain and limited, yes. But what it lacks in beauty it makes up
for in tcp socket chatter.
-Jonathan
On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:02 PM, david medine <dmed...@ucsd.edu>
wrote:
One thing I'd be interested in knowing about is what (if anything) someone
tried to do in Pd, but couldn't given its limitations (apart from
look/feel/convenience issues).
On 2/23/16 8:54 AM, Matt Barber wrote:
This thread has inspired me to work on a fork called Pd-limited.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:27 AM, jamal crawford <three...@ml1.net> wrote:
hi list
>Max have features like auto-align horizontally/vertically and align and
route patch cords which is very useful to >organize patch cords and make the
thinks more readable. I like them a lot.
this is so old. this comparing .... so old.
if you like your fancy gui's, use them! have you heard of OSC? just dump
whatever you want thru it and run a headless instance of pd, where you recieve
it. nobody will even notice. are you a nerd or just pretending :P
sorry no offence .)
peace
~/.jc
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
