2016-05-14 13:53 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette <[email protected]>: > Note that the previous sample was 0
well, if you're not at "0", but somewhere else, and give it a "0, 64 1.451247" message, it goes to "1" and not "0"and the previous sample wasn't "0" 2016-05-14 17:39 GMT-03:00 Thomas Grill <[email protected]>: > Hi Miller, > If the time interval given amounts to let's say 64 samples, the target > value is reached at sample index 63, that is, before the block boundary. To > me that seems conceptually wrong. > i think you mean it should start with 0 and I agree > In fact, I found it so hard to work with vline~ (and line~) in a > predictable and sample-accurate way that i resorted to biquad~ generated > ramps in most of my patches. > how about rpole~ ? cheers
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
