> If the time interval given amounts to let's say 64 samples, the target value > is reached at sample index 63, that is, before the block boundary. To me that > seems conceptually wrong. > > i think you mean it should start with 0 and I agree
That is a consequence of a given time interval > 0. If the given time interval is zero, it should start with 0. For a time interval equivalent to 1 sample, the output should look like 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ..... Another way to see it is what happens if vline~ is used to drive tabread*~ . Of course it should start playing at sample index 0 of the table, not at index 1. > > In fact, I found it so hard to work with vline~ (and line~) in a predictable > and sample-accurate way that i resorted to biquad~ generated ramps in most of > my patches. > > how about rpole~ ? true, it's the same, maybe slightly more efficient. best, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
