On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 14:14 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2016-06-09 10:33, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > Sorry if I missed this, but what is the point of displaying > > incompatible (wrong arch, wrong platform) Deken packages? What > > would be > > harmed if they'd be hidden completely? I fail to see the advantage > > of > > having the possibility of downloading a package of wrong > > arch/platform. > like: preparing your patch for offline use on multiple archs, which > you > currently don't have access to. > > or: checking whether the library exists at all, and if I could nag > its > osx maintainer to give me w32 binaries. >
Right. Both makes sense to me. Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
