On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 20:15 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 06/13/2016 11:25 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > I believe yet all have agreed to ~/.local/lib/pd/extra as the > > default > > install path (and most recent Deken uses it). > more important: (upcoming) Pd-0.47-1 uses it > > > > > There was some concerns about creating directories without asking. > > Now, > > do those concerns still apply with above default install path? It > > seems > > pretty normal that applications do stuff there. Is anyone still > > against > > auto-creating? > it seems indeed that the main obstacle for automatic directory > creation > has gone with this new default user-specific search path. > if there is some consensus, i will happily re-enable the directory > creation. > (but it seems that everybody has gone into sleep mode again, and will > only awake after the next release)
OK, time to wake up, release is out! ;-) Seriously, current implementation doesn't give a hint for a good choice of install directory (it suggests ~/ if there is no ~/.local/lib/pd/extra) . Even if the user-specific search directory is not auto-created, at least the plugin should give a hint of what is a sensible choice. Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
