The same possible one-tick delay happens with throw~/catch. There's no way around such a delay when the reading object comes before the writing one - it's a fundamental limitation of digital signal processing.
Pd ought to offer a better way to force order of execution than the ones that are available, but that's an ongoing question for me :) Miller On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:58:33PM +0200, oliver wrote: > jlistshit wrote: > > Use throw~ and catch~ instead of send~ and receive~. > > hi, > > sorry, not possible. only one catch~ for multiple throw~ objects > > i need it the other way round ... > > > btw: is there a technical difference between send~ and throw~ ? > > > > thanks anyway > > oliver > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
