On 09/13/2016 08:24 PM, oliver wrote: > i'm not really sure i implemented everything the right way, but in my > tests i came to the conclusion, that the send~ object has to be created > AFTER the corresponding receives~ (regardless of subpatches) to work > correctly in this setup. > > can you confirm this ?
oh no, please don't do this. never. ever. it's a sure way to call the wrath of the gods upon you. depending on the creation order is the signal domain equivalent of the dreaded fan-out in the message domain. in the message domain use [trigger]. in the signal domain, use connections. it's quite simple: if you have two subpatches/abstractions that are connected via a signal-connection, then the "upper" subpatch will always be evaluated before the "lower" subpatch; simply because the lower one is waiting for the upper one to produce data - even if the connection is really just a dummy one. gfmrdsa IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
