or make a subpatch named something like [pd $0-subpatch] inside your abstraction and place your tables there. this is what I usually do.
Christof Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2016 um 00:53 Uhr Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" <[email protected]> An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [PD] abstractions and dynamic patching [namecanvas] seem to do the trick ;) 2016-12-20 21:10 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>: so, working on a buffer~ abstraction, it loads several [table] objects with dynamic patching, up to 64 channels, according to arguments that specify buffer name and number of channels. Now, if I create a 2nd buffer~ abstraction and create more table objects, they do get also created in the first abstraction. This happens because inside each abstraction, when I send messages to the pd file, it communicates with all instances of the abstraction. Is there a way to interact with only one instance with dynamic patching??? thanks_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list[https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
