nice, several options, haha 2016-12-20 22:45 GMT-02:00 Christof Ressi <[email protected]>:
> or make a subpatch named something like [pd $0-subpatch] inside your > abstraction and place your tables there. this is what I usually do. > > Christof > > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2016 um 00:53 Uhr > Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" <[email protected]> > An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [PD] abstractions and dynamic patching > > [namecanvas] seem to do the trick ;) > > 2016-12-20 21:10 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]>: > so, working on a buffer~ abstraction, it loads several [table] objects > with dynamic patching, up to 64 channels, according to arguments that > specify buffer name and number of channels. Now, if I create a 2nd buffer~ > abstraction and create more table objects, they do get also created in the > first abstraction. This happens because inside each abstraction, when I > send messages to the pd file, it communicates with all instances of the > abstraction. Is there a way to interact with only one instance with dynamic > patching??? > thanks_______________________________________________ [email protected] > mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list[https:// > lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list] >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
