> I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla Maybe because it lives in extra/ instead of src/ ?
What is extra/ there for, by the way? I remember it being mentioned in msp's paper that introduced [pd~], but not sure why it is still there. Giulio ________________________________ From: Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 17:13 Subject: Re: [PD] test audio signals: Are there <~ and >~ objects? 2017-02-06 11:00 GMT-02:00 Peter P. <[email protected]>: Thanks IOhannes and Roman! Funny there are no internal objects for this. >best, P > [expr~] is an internal 2017-02-06 11:11 GMT-02:00 cyrille henry <[email protected]>: for a vanilla only solution, you can use tabread~ with a 2 point table... > I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla the vanilla solution is with [expr~], which is an internal in vanilla cheers _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
