yeah, it's confusing, but it's just "more" stuff into the vanilla package
2017-02-06 15:18 GMT-02:00 Giulio Moro <[email protected]>: > > I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla > > Maybe because it lives in extra/ instead of src/ ? > > What is extra/ there for, by the way? I remember it being mentioned in > msp's paper that introduced [pd~], but not sure why it is still there. > Giulio > > > ________________________________ > From: Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 17:13 > Subject: Re: [PD] test audio signals: Are there <~ and >~ objects? > > > 2017-02-06 11:00 GMT-02:00 Peter P. <[email protected]>: > Thanks IOhannes and Roman! Funny there are no internal objects for this. > >best, P > > > > [expr~] is an internal > > 2017-02-06 11:11 GMT-02:00 cyrille henry <[email protected]>: > for a vanilla only solution, you can use tabread~ with a 2 point table... > > > > I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla > > the vanilla solution is with [expr~], which is an internal in vanilla > > > cheers > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
