Yes it's a bug. I only tested with the built-in samples in the soundfiler-help patch which are 44.1kz and as Lucas discovered, higher values are truncated leading to incorrect numbers.
Here is a tentative fix: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/240 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/240> > On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:21 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:47:09 +0200 > From: Philipp Schmalfuß <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [PD] soundfiler issues > Message-ID: <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; > format="flowed" > > dear list, > > i ran into some trouble with the new features of [soundfiler] > recently. It does not output the samplerate of .wave files correctly > (haven't tried .aiff yet). With 96kHz files i got 30464, with 192kHz > files 60928. Iemlib/soundfile_info did gave me the correct samplerate > of the same soundfiles. So, is this a bug? -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
