Thanx Dan, Your fix (PR #240) is working nicely. Tested on Windows and Linux.
-- Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. On 10/28/2017 8:02 AM, Dan Wilcox wrote: Yes it's a bug. I only tested with the built-in samples in the soundfiler-help patch which are 44.1kz and as Lucas discovered, higher values are truncated leading to incorrect numbers. Here is a tentative fix: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/240 On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:21 PM, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:47:09 +0200 From: Philipp Schmalfuß <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [PD] soundfiler issues Message-ID: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" dear list, i ran into some trouble with the new features of [soundfiler] recently. It does not output the samplerate of .wave files correctly (haven't tried .aiff yet). With 96kHz files i got 30464, with 192kHz files 60928. Iemlib/soundfile_info did gave me the correct samplerate of the same soundfiles. So, is this a bug? -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika<http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com<http://danomatika.com> robotcowboy.com<http://robotcowboy.com> _______________________________________________ [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
