> On 18 Dec 2017, at 14:33, Brady Sharp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Using the dynamically-created solution in my example let's everything work as > it should. That abstraction passes audio right after creation, without > having to toggle DSP, or save, or anything else. the point that johannes makes is, that you are toggling the dsp by creating new objects.
> > I think it would be an improvement for a basic routing abstraction to work as > it should, and not have someone learn dynamic patching to get around it, > which is why I brought it up, but I'm personally fine with my workaround. > > Thanks again! > > Brady > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On 2017-12-18 00:45, Brady Sharp wrote: > > I'd rather not toggle DSP, > > since I could be in the midst of recording a long loop or something > > but you already do (by whatever you do to make Pd aware of new signal > processing objects). > or am i missing something ( i *might* be). > > fgasdmr > IOhannes > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> > > > > > -- > Brady Sharp > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > bradysharp.com <http://bradysharp.com/> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/bradysharp> > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
