Oh, OK! Understood. Thanks for clarifying. Brady
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017, 2:30 PM Simon Iten <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18 Dec 2017, at 14:33, Brady Sharp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Using the dynamically-created solution in my example let's everything work > as it should. That abstraction passes audio right after creation, without > having to toggle DSP, or save, or anything else. > > the point that johannes makes is, that you are toggling the dsp by > creating new objects. > > > I think it would be an improvement for a basic routing abstraction to work > as it should, and not have someone learn dynamic patching to get around it, > which is why I brought it up, but I'm personally fine with my workaround. > > Thanks again! > > Brady > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 2017-12-18 00:45, Brady Sharp wrote: >> > I'd rather not toggle DSP, >> > since I could be in the midst of recording a long loop or something >> >> but you already do (by whatever you do to make Pd aware of new signal >> processing objects). >> or am i missing something ( i *might* be). >> >> fgasdmr >> IOhannes >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > > > -- > Brady Sharp > [email protected] > bradysharp.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/bradysharp> > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
