I am biased of course, but checking for t_message_responder class within 
canvas_getdollarzero seems a bit weird to me. I rather preferred to add a 
function which gets the canvas $0 from a glist (which can be useful anyway) and 
made both binbuf_dorealizedollarsym and binbuf_doeval take the $0 value 
explicitly. but it's a matter of taste I guess. 

Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. April 2018 um 14:10 Uhr
Von: "Dan Wilcox" <danomat...@gmail.com>
An: "Jonathan Wilkes" <jancs...@yahoo.com>
Cc: Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at>, "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at>
Betreff: Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

Is this compatible with https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/347/files? 
Are there pros/cons between the implementations? 
On Apr 17, 2018, at 12:00 PM, 
pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at[mailto:pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at] wrote: 
From: Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com[mailto:jancs...@yahoo.com]>
To: pd-list <pd-l...@iem.at[mailto:pd-l...@iem.at]>, Christof Ressi 
Subject: Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
 On Saturday, April 7, 2018, 10:23:31 PM EDT, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list 
<pd-list@lists.iem.at[mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at]> wrote:  On Friday, April 6, 
2018, 11:21:05 AM EDT, Christof Ressi 
<christof.re...@gmx.at[mailto:christof.re...@gmx.at]> wrote:  
here's an alternative implementation which uses no additional memory >> 
allocations but is more invasive: 
 the beginning of another implementation with some performance 
 This has now been merged into 2.5.1.

Dan Wilcox

Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 

Reply via email to