Ok, cool. We should port this as an alternate implementation PR on Github. I think it's worth trying to backport stuff like this and stay more in sync, when possible. Thanks for posting :)
enohp ym morf tnes ----------- Dan Wilcox danomatika.com robotcowboy.com > On Apr 17, 2018, at 2:48 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, April 17, 2018, 8:10:47 AM EDT, Dan Wilcox > > <danomat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Is this compatible with > > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/347/files? Are there pros/cons > > between the implementations? > > This implementation doesn't require a change to binbuf_eval's > interface. It also caches a glist instead of the dollarzero value. > That seems a little cleaner since glist is public data and > dollarzero isn't. > > Performance looks ok to me. > > -Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
