I have to say I like the new feature and being able to avoid loading the same patch twice, even as an expert, so I guess a flag or something that allows us to configure this is fine.
Em sáb, 22 de set de 2018 às 13:30, Miller Puckette <[email protected]> escreveu: > Ah, yes, a fourth option: have a new "pd really-open" message to open > a file without checking if it's a duplicate. > > cheers > M > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 06:18:42PM +0200, IOhannes m zm??lnig wrote: > > On 9/22/18 3:17 PM, katja wrote: > > > Much to my alarm, Pd 0.49test3 prevents loading multiple instances of > > > a patch, and release notes tell us that this is on purpose. > > > > > > funnily, i recently worked on a related regression where double-clicking > > on a Pd-patch (in your favourite Windows exploder) would start a new > > instance of Pd (rather than switching to the current instance and > > raising the patch if already opened). > > > > note however, that this regression (fix) is unrelated to what you are > > describing. > > > > and i agree that it should be possible to open the same patch multiple > > times. esp. on a programmatic layer (that is: by sending messages to Pd). > > i guess, when opening an already opened patch from the menu (Ctrl-O), Pd > > could *ask* whether this is really intended. > > > > > > > > gkmdsar > > IOhannes > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
