Yes I realized that. So it should be something more specific. Why not a wider scope object, like [pdconfig], that would take "once" as an argument?
Antoine Rousseau http://www.metalu.net <http://metalu.net> __ http://www.metaluachahuter.com/ <http://www.metaluachahuter.com/compagnies/al1-ant1/> Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 à 23:55, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> a écrit : > On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:29 +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote: > > Of course [once] would be much better than [lock].... > > [once] is taken by iemlib. Not that I think every library in existence > should be considered regarding name conflicts when introducing new > objects to Pd, but I feel that [once] is in wide use and adding a > [once] with totally different behavior would be a bold move. > > Roman_______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
