Well, I ended up simply reverting to the old behavior but leaving a hook in so that users can specifically ask only to open a patch once.
cheers M On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 12:10:01AM +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote: > Yes I realized that. So it should be something more specific. > Why not a wider scope object, like [pdconfig], that would take "once" as an > argument? > > Antoine Rousseau > http://www.metalu.net <http://metalu.net> __ > http://www.metaluachahuter.com/ > <http://www.metaluachahuter.com/compagnies/al1-ant1/> > > > > Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 ?? 23:55, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> a ??crit : > > > On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:29 +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote: > > > Of course [once] would be much better than [lock].... > > > > [once] is taken by iemlib. Not that I think every library in existence > > should be considered regarding name conflicts when introducing new > > objects to Pd, but I feel that [once] is in wide use and adding a > > [once] with totally different behavior would be a bold move. > > > > Roman_______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
