hmm, weird, I don't seem to find problems... Em qua, 9 de jan de 2019 às 12:10, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> escreveu:
> On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 11:27 -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > yeah, I also get lots of glitches and artifacts with a 64 minimum > > window. I have to increase the delay up to 50ms so I get rid of them, > > which is kinda bad, even though it seems incredibly efficient. > > Just to clear: I'm not experiencing Pd glitches at any configured audio > setting whatsoever. What I mean is the abstractions produces 'wrong' > results when configured to 64. I don't understand enough to give any > hint why 128 is still fine and 64 sounds off. > > > Brent is not using gardner's approach I assume. And what this does is > > that it increases the window over and over in the following > > partitions, this is why it gets so much lighter on the CPU > > Yeah. From what I gather without reading William Brent's [convolve~]'s > source code, is that it uses n partitions with same size. At least the > printed number seems to suggest that. Thus, using a smaller delay leads > to a significantly increased CPU load. With Gardener's approach, the > penalty of a short delay is almost not noticeable. > > Roman > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
