Em sex, 11 de jan de 2019 às 19:25, Alexandre Torres Porres < [email protected]> escreveu:
> > So it seems this delay scheme needs to be revised, and maybe that's why > the minimum window size of 64 gives us some weird artifacts! > Actually, based on another thread I opened here on the list, it seems the minimum hop size for an overlap needs to be 64, so [block~ 64 2] wouldn't really work... this means that starting with a window of 64 samples could raise issues, hence it might be the actual culprit!
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
