Em Seg, 4 de mar de 2019 08:50, José de Abreu <[email protected]> escreveu:
> claude pointed the discussion that has an amazing easy way. > > instead of trying to get a bang from phasor someway, you can create a > phasor with bangs > > > [metro x] > | > [0, 1 x ( > | > [vline~] > > where x is freq/samprate, > ops 1000/freq, wrong formula, sorry you could calculate it and send it to metro and through a [f ] banged by > the metro to a [0, 1 $1( > > pros: easy way to access the bangs with exactly time > > cons: -it is impossible (not impossible, i propose a hard solution after) > to change the frequency while ramp is going, you can only change it for the > next ramp. This makes low frequencies annoying to control this way. > > -one possible way to overcome this problem is using some doppler delay > line after the ramp while recalculating mannualy where the next bang should > be, and when that arrives we start the metro and reset the doppler. Just > forget this, but would be an idea. > > > Em Seg, 4 de mar de 2019 06:45, Lorenzo Sutton <[email protected]> > escreveu: > >> On 02/03/19 14:20, Orm Finnendahl wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > is there some easy way in vanilla pd to get a bang on each phasor~ >> > wraparound which doesn't involve polling with snapshot~? >> > >> > Something like samphold~, but outputting bangs instead of signals. >> > >> >> Curiosity: What's your use case? >> >> Lorenzo. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
