I would also point out that internal messages such as pd-dsp-started don't really come with an expected behavior for user patches. Saying how it works is a "bug" belies that fact that I don't believe it was ever intended to be used for this and just because it can be grabbed via a [r] also doesn't guarantee anything. This is also why it's so hard to change almost *any* behavior within Pd as you can never really be 100% certain you aren't breaking someone's end use case.
> On Feb 18, 2020, at 11:57 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > If, say, you want to send one and only one bang to [switch~] so as to graph > tables when DSP starts, then [r pd-dsp-started] is only useful if you > spigot-out future bangs/saves/etc, otherwise you are graphing tables on > every save... > > It's a feature if you use it for randomness, say, to randomize seeds > according to when dsp on/off switching or graph redrawing falls, say linked > with a [timer] object :) > > Perhaps [r pd-dsp-started] should only send bangs when dsp starts or stops, > and not when the dsp graph is redrawn. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
