Yes -- each person has to do it to allow it to run on their system. brad
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:40 AM João Pais <[email protected]> wrote: > that is interesting. But it means that each person has to do it in their > system, correct? I can't do it after creating the package and then > distribute it around? > > (for the people I'll send this, running a terminal command is much harder > than clicking on the system settings) > > > You can use a variant of these instructions: >> >> >> http://sites.music.columbia.edu/brad/osx-windows-new-RTcmixes/annoying.html >> >> to get around the STUPID ANNOYING STUPID OBNXIOUS Apple gatekeeper >> code-signing thing. >> >> brad >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 8:51 AM João Pais <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I'm preparing a package based on Pd work, but I run into annoying >>> problems with recent apple OSs, namely notarization and security. Things >>> seem to work if the user commits to switching off all security protocols, >>> but for people who don't know Pd, they might be squeamish about this. >>> Therefore I wanted to ask a couple of questions to someone who might have >>> experience in distributing pd-based patches. >>> >>> For clarity: the package is a max patch (for both runtime and standalone >>> versions), with the Pd app and patches included in a supporting folder - >>> running with the recent pd~ object. When done properly, the user won't even >>> be aware that pd itself is running. >>> >>> - how can one avoid asking a user to allow safety access to Pd and its >>> externals? And while at that, to the max standalone as well? >>> - I'm myself a windows user, and don't have a mac - I can only get the >>> standalone compiled when a friend grants me access to his computer. Which >>> system do you advise to prepare a package? It works fine in 10.13, from >>> 10.15 seems to be problematic. >>> - I had a look at codesigning a package, but it seems that it's >>> necessary to sign up as an apple developer and pay 100us a year, which I'm >>> not willing to do. The package won't be going to any app store, it's just >>> to distribute as a zip file for computers. Any way to circumvent this? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> jmmmp >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
