On 12/18/20 9:06 PM, Peter P. wrote:
* IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> [2020-12-18 20:52]:On 12/18/20 8:40 PM, Peter P. wrote:Hi list,just discovered that Pd's jack audio ouput ports are numbered from zero onwards. Is this very intentional?it's been on my todo-list for ages to fix this.Great, good to hear! Thanks IO!
while fixing the issue is trivial, i wonder what's the best way to proceed.simply changing the port-names from "input0" to "input1" will probably break all existing auto connection-setups (e.g. qjackctl patchbays).
currently they will do something like: "puredata:output1 -> system:capture_0"if we just renumber the ports, this will *certainly* introduce off-by-one errors (e.g. have movie dialoge come out of the sub woofer).
so we probably should name the ports slightly different, so that "output0" becomes "output_1".
(the ALSA backend of jack uses underscores as a separator; but Ardour (somewhat canonical) uses spaces - though i'd rather avoid that)
what do you think. famdsr IOhannes
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
