* IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> [2020-12-18 21:16]: > On 12/18/20 9:06 PM, Peter P. wrote: > > * IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> [2020-12-18 20:52]: > > > On 12/18/20 8:40 PM, Peter P. wrote: > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > just discovered that Pd's jack audio ouput ports are numbered from zero > > > > onwards. Is this very intentional? > > > > > > it's been on my todo-list for ages to fix this. > > Great, good to hear! Thanks IO! > > while fixing the issue is trivial, i wonder what's the best way to proceed. > simply changing the port-names from "input0" to "input1" will probably break > all existing auto connection-setups (e.g. qjackctl patchbays). > > currently they will do something like: > "puredata:output1 -> system:capture_0" > > if we just renumber the ports, this will *certainly* introduce off-by-one > errors (e.g. have movie dialoge come out of the sub woofer). > > so we probably should name the ports slightly different, so that "output0" > becomes "output_1". Elegantly circumnavigating the above issue I find. > (the ALSA backend of jack uses underscores as a separator; but Ardour > (somewhat canonical) uses spaces - though i'd rather avoid that) I'd recommend underscores as they are easier to put as command line flags for eg. jack_capture or jack_connect.
cheersz, P _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
