Ah yes, you are right. [timeout( is for TCP. I think I got that mixed up with UDP previously closing itself after some sort of unknown host return etc which we removed to make it "fire and forget."
> On Jun 4, 2021, at 4:17 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 16:17:29 +0200 > From: Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com <mailto:reduz...@gmail.com>> > To: Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com <mailto:danomat...@gmail.com>> > Cc: Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>> > Subject: Re: [PD] UDP server with Pd > Message-ID: <2aed329cdb23e198c96f658f05a81ce4f276bf84.ca...@gmail.com > <mailto:2aed329cdb23e198c96f658f05a81ce4f276bf84.ca...@gmail.com>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 19:51 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote: >> You could try a longer connection timeout via the [timeout f( >> message. > > Isn't the 'timeout' method only affecting TCP sessions? In UDP nothing > at all is sent when using 'connect' method. It internally sets > destination address and port, I believe. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
