Actually, isn't pd~ already compiled for arm64? What am I missing...? % file /Applications/Pd-0.53-1.app/Contents/Resources/extra/pd~/pd~.d_fat /Applications/Pd-0.53-1.app/Contents/Resources/extra/pd~/pd~.d_fat: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures: [x86_64:Mach-O 64-bit bundle x86_64] [arm64:Mach-O 64-bit bundle arm64] /Applications/Pd-0.53-1.app/Contents/Resources/extra/pd~/pd~.d_fat (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle x86_64 /Applications/Pd-0.53-1.app/Contents/Resources/extra/pd~/pd~.d_fat (for architecture arm64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle arm64
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 07:49:43PM +0100, IOhannes m zm?lnig wrote: > Am 28. Dezember 2022 16:20:08 MEZ schrieb "Jo?o Pais" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> ah ah actually the wink was for Miller - pd~ doesn't work on M1 yet. > > Why not? -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
