errata: An object like **dict *would, of course, be a nice high level
option for less savvy users.

Em ter., 10 de fev. de 2026 às 21:45, Alexandre Torres Porres <
[email protected]> escreveu:

> Em ter., 10 de fev. de 2026 às 20:53, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]>
> escreveu:
>
>> however using a name would suffice and matches existing behavior for
>> object-as-datastore.
>>
>
> I think I agree
>
>
>
>> The complexity comes if you want to support nested data, ie. if we have
>> "key" : "value" is value just an atom or list internally or can it also be
>> an array or another dict?
>>
>
> I'm still getting acquainted with all this. Until the other day I never
> really had the need to use something like [coll]. But anyway, isn't the
> idea nesting a key feature for dictionaries?
>
> A plain and flat key => value thing is already achievable with [text].
> That's how I built my [messcoll] abstraction.
>
>
>> It so, the it feels like we are reinventing JSON
>>
>
> Yeah, and it's the idea in MAX, where dictionaries are claimed to be what
> JSON objects are, and the objects can read and write JSON files. So I guess
> it would come down to this particular feature, and with nesting of course.
>
>
>> and is this not applicable to extending data structures in some way?
>>
>> For these kinds of things, I'd personally rather just wish for a core lua
>> external as I feel things start to get away from the patching metaphor. In
>> this case, I could script the objects behavior and the data store is
>> contained within it.
>>
>
> Well, I did mention that in the beginning of this discussion. So yeah,
> supporting lua as a native scripting language would do the trick and also
> allow more things. Actually, our bhack project uses lua tables as
> dictionaries to do what BACH in MAX does with nested lists.
>
> Not sure about loading and exporting JSON files, how easy that'd be. I
> never needed any of those. An object like did would, of course, be a nice
> high level option for less savvy users.
>
> cheers
>
>
>>
>> enohp ym morf tnes
>> -----------
>> Dan Wilcox
>> danomatika.com
>> robotcowboy.com
>>
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2026, at 11:02 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Now that I am thinking about it, I see that [text] is kinda like that. We
>> don't have a "text" message type, and it is not exposed in the Pd
>> ecosystem, right? In a sense, same for "arrays". MAX, in the same way,
>> doesn't expose the data type and can use named objects to share data. It
>> can output a pointer, but that is coded as regular symbol.
>>
>> The ceammc approach adds complexity with new data types for nothing as I
>> see it now. There are other ways to manage it. Now that I am going for an
>> external that handles it, I'm totally not doing the same and will try to
>> make something like MAX.
>>
>> It now boils down to how we could add this to Vanilla and what it means
>> in practice. It could also be just like in MAX and we could pass pointers
>> as symbols... or is it a not too crazy idea do add a new data structure
>> type and have pointers for it too? This is where I'm frying my brain now.
>> It'd be an odd case out that we'd have a data type without having them
>> exposed as data structures.
>>
>> One way or another, this can be exposed in the API for externals, it has
>> nothing to do with Pd data types on the patch level, right?
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Em ter., 10 de fev. de 2026 às 16:48, Alexandre Torres Porres <
>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>
>>> Em ter., 10 de fev. de 2026 às 15:13, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> If we prefer to stick to simple, C-inspired syntax, I'd recommend
>>>> looking at Lua's approach with its table data structure. There is beauty in
>>>> the minimalism IMO. I am not really of the opinion that Pd should expand to
>>>> naturally include every data type to solve every problem in everyone's own
>>>> way. For specific problems, that's where an external or scripting interface
>>>> comes in.
>>>>
>>>
>>> yeah, so, you think that if we could add these to Vanilla we'd need not
>>> to add more data types, huh? I also wonder what is the advantage for an
>>> external to create and deal with an extra data type. The might be some I
>>> guess but I have no idea and my intuition is that it's best to just treat
>>> these as Pd lists with some special syntax.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> enohp ym morf tnes
>>>> -----------
>>>> Dan Wilcox
>>>> danomatika.com
>>>> robotcowboy.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On Feb 10, 2026, at 5:55 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig via Pd-list <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Am 10. Februar 2026 17:21:58 MEZ schrieb Alexandre Torres Porres <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>> >> While we're at it, I'd like to mention the ceammc library, that can
>>>> be
>>>> >> installed in Vanilla (or you can use it as part of the Pd-Ceammc
>>>> fork) and
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > well yeah.
>>>> >
>>>> > there's also "pdcontainer" (from about 2004) by Georg Holzmann, that
>>>> maps c++ std::containers (including dicts) to pd.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > mfg.sfg.jfd
>>>> > IOhannes
>>>> > ---
>>>> > [email protected] - the Pure Data mailinglist
>>>> >
>>>> https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/QRGLHRQDTYORJPNFFTMASFFPWDFOEYW5/
>>>> >
>>>> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] mailing
>>>> list
>>>> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.iem.at/
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> [email protected] - the Pure Data mailinglist
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/WALVCVGZFLKWQW4OMWK662Y2T4OM5US7/
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] mailing list
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.iem.at/
>>>
>>>
---
[email protected] - the Pure Data mailinglist
https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/XB4M7VVEBCSBQNHX3VYTH52LFPHFG747/

To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.iem.at/

Reply via email to