Hi JP.
I have finished the LZW implementation.
Thanks.
Two notes:
- With cache < 5 we cannot assure that some characters are missed
in a compression-decompression cycle (footer sequence sequence
takes several chars).
[...]
I would have fixed this but with the previous issue (which is an
architecture problem, not implementation).
I dont understand the reason for this limitation. It is related to a
problem onn the streams architecture or with a problem on the filter
internal architecture.
A minimum size of 5 for the stream cache is reasonable, but if it is a
problem in the streams implementation more problems may arise in the
future.
BTW, I am very busy for the rest of October. Is it too much to wait for
the predictor's reimplementation till the first week of November?
It is ok, many thanks.
