Martin Schröder wrote: > > Using the word "consumers" here > > Customers would be a better term.
I don't see the difference, honestly. I don't consider myself a customer of glibc, Guile or Emacs. If you're talking about commercial software, the GPL is perfectly fine for that. (I would bite the bullet and say that it is _much_ better than non-copyleft licenses, as it encourages fair competition.) > I'm talking about developers releasing code which uses GNUpdf. I'm talking about that too. Nobody forces you as a developer to use this particular library. As a developer, you decide what to use and how. So talking about "force" here is entirely out of place. > And nobody is forced to develope software using GNUpdf, right. If this is some kind of a sarcastic comment that the library is currently useless -- well, it is. That's irrelevant to the discussion at hand, though.
