Dear pdl-general list, (had to send again, after subscribing - whoops) Luis has quite correctly reminded me of this list. I have very recently revived the question of "whither PDL", and am very interested to get the thoughts of the wider community. The relevant posting is:
https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/mailman/message/36638395/ - some explanation of detail on this crazy "PDLA" thing (I've checked, and PDLA does in fact still call its executable "pdl" - as I've said on the thread, that's a bug and I will fix it) Basically, the question is: do you, dear scientist/PDL user, still use PDL? Would the increased reproducibility that is easily within reach add value? (I emphasise reproducibility because a quick scan of the -general list showed people wanting to patch PDL "proper", which means anyone trying to reproduce their results would need to also use the patched version, which is a disaster in my opinion) Best regards, Ed -----Original Message----- From: Luis Mochan Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2019 4:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] Whither PDL? On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:45:54AM -0400, Terry Gaetz wrote: > I have been using PDL for more than a decade (or is it two?). Generally, > mere users don't pipe up on pdl-devel... Maybe more PDL users may be found on pdl-general -- o W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*) Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\ Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \ Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | [email protected] /\_/\__/ GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16 C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB _______________________________________________ pdl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel _______________________________________________ pdl-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
