On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 06:23:15PM +0000, Ed . wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> I have been pushing for a very long time to split down PDL, which is
> accepted in principle (see this message from 2015:
> ...
> PDLA was conceived as a way to break this logjam. Therefore, while I of
> course agree with your point, and not coincidentally with myself, PDLA is
> the only way forward. It's a misfortune that I haven't updated it since the
> first effort, but I am going to rectify that. Hence this conversation!
I understand. I'll try to help.
Best regards,
Luis
--
o
W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*)
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\
Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \
Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | [email protected] /\_/\__/
GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16 C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB
_______________________________________________
pdl-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
