I have managed to reproduce plplot failure with cygwin :(

So let us keep it disabled by default for 2.008

--
kmx

On 22.1.2015 17:42, Chris Marshall wrote:
There were a number of issues reported that may be fixed.
I can change the setting for the next CPAN developers release
but we still need someone to test whether everything works or
not.  I would have done this already but only since the last
PLplot release has it built on cygwin and I have yet to have time
to test the PDL::Graphics::PLplot install.

--Chris


On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Doug Hunt <dh...@ucar.edu <mailto:dh...@ucar.edu>> wrote:

    Hi Chris: The last I knew, PDL::Graphics::PLplot was working fine.
    I'm using an old version of PDL (2.4.11) for my production software,
    though.

    What is it that breaks, and how best to test it?  I'd like to get
    this working, but I have not been keeping up with the latest PDL
    development.
    Is PDL on git now, or is it still officially in Source Forge SVN?

    Best Regards,

      Doug Hunt (author and (sometimes) maintainer of PDL::Graphics::PLplot)




    On 01/22/15 04:17, Chris Marshall wrote:

        Yes.  The last status was that the PDL::Graphics::PLplot build
        did not work.
        If it can be checked out with the new PLplot then I would be happy to
        change the setting.

        The latest release of PLplot allows me to build on cygwin but I
        haven't
        had time to try it out myself.  This would be a nice addition for
        PDL-2.008.

        --Chris

        On 1/21/2015 16:54, kmx wrote:

            Chris,

            is there still a reason for having default:

            WITH_PLPLOT => 0  # which means disabled

            instead of

            WITH_PLPLOT => undef  # which means try to detect

            --
            kmx

            On 18.1.2015 17:06, Chris Marshall wrote:

                We're coming up on the end of January and the PDL-2.008
                release.  If
                you have any essential features, fixes, improvements you
                would like
                to see in PDL-2.008, now is the time to wrap them up. I'm
                working on
                a few myself but I'm fine with getting an official
                PDL-2.008 out this
                month.  CPAN testers look good and there are some fixes and
                improvements versus PDL-2.007 that are worth a broader venue.

                --Chris




            _______________________________________________
            PDL-porters mailing list
            PDL-porters@jach.hawaii.edu <mailto:PDL-porters@jach.hawaii.edu>
            http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters




        _______________________________________________
        PDL-porters mailing list
        PDL-porters@jach.hawaii.edu <mailto:PDL-porters@jach.hawaii.edu>
        http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters


    _______________________________________________
    PDL-porters mailing list
    PDL-porters@jach.hawaii.edu <mailto:PDL-porters@jach.hawaii.edu>
    http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters




_______________________________________________
PDL-porters mailing list
PDL-porters@jach.hawaii.edu
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters

_______________________________________________
PDL-porters mailing list
PDL-porters@jach.hawaii.edu
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters

Reply via email to