I am not familiar with the super take or tele-tak variants, but I do
know that the tele-tak predates the super tak. I have the SMC tak 4.0
and am very fond of it. It seems to be very sharp and is quite easy to
focus. In sessions where I've used all three lenses, I've noticed it has
decidedly more contrast than both the K-mount SMC Pentax 400/5.6 and the
SMC tak 200/4.
Dave Weiss wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> I am thinking of adding a 300 mm lens to my screwmount collection. The
> tele-takumars seem to be low priced, do they pre-date the super takumar or
> are the optical coatings about the same? Would it be wise to hold out for a
> smc tak? Is the difference that great? How about the f4.0 vs 6.3? Is the
> 6.3 very hard to focus due to the light loss?
>
> Any opinions at all on any of these lenses would be greatly appreciated!
>
> thanks
>
> dave
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
>http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
> Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
