"Robert P. VanNatta" wrote: > the classic 50 mm f1.7 reversed with > 3 extension tubes is said to provide > a 1.54 magnification and required an > exposure compensation of 6.2 f stops. > > A 28 mm f2.8 reversed with 3 extension > tubes is said to provide 3.78 magnification > and require an astounding 19.1 f stops of > exposure compensation. Where did you get that information? Is there a formula for calculating these results? You mentioned a book in one of your earlier posts - what book is that? Thanks! -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
- Maximum Extension Tube Length Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Robert P. VanNatta
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Robert P. VanNatta
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Flavio Minelli
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length tom
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Ann Sanfedele
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Bill D. Casselberry
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Robert VanNatta
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Mark Cassino
- Re: Maximum Extension Tube Length Robert P. VanNatta

