Dan Scott wrote: > Don't lenses age over time, too? > Maybe what you are seeing is the > difference caused by the coatings > on the older lenses oxidising over time? I've not heard of coatings oxidizing. However, I've purchased new M-series lenses within the last year or so, as well as having recently purchased new and used A-series lenses, and a new FA lens, and each series show differences in the the coatings. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "The difference between a good photograph and a great photograph is subtleties." - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 mi... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 mi... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) herbet brasileiro
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Joseph Tainter
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Shel Belinkoff
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Dan Scott
- Sexy Spotmatic J. C. O'Connell
- Re: Sexy Spotmatic David S.
- Re: Sexy Spotmatic Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Sexy Spotmatic Steve Larson
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 mi... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.... Rob Studdert
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Mark Cassino
- SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Mike Johnston
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) David A. Mann
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 mi... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Rob Studdert
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Alan Chan
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) SudaMafud
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Shel Belinkoff

