I just hope it has a nicer viewfinder, and a little more weight then the
ZX5N.
Thanks,
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: The MZ-S is coming
> Ken Takeshita wrote:
>
> >I held my MZ-3 exactly in the way the Italian magazine photo showed, and
it
> >looked to me almost the same size as the MZ-3.
> >
> >So, I think the MZ-S is really compact, and as you say, it would be nice
to
> >see the compact camera like this with better and refined features (slant
> >part could house more things than the current MZ series). At this size,
I
> >would not complain some missing features etc.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Ken
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> I think you're right.
>
> I did the same thing with my zx-5n (and I have large hands); the only
> difference in size I could see was the mz-s was taller where the upper
deck
> was raised and tilted. The total height, from the top of the pentaprism to
> the bottom of the camera, as well as the total width, right side to left
> side, looks identical to the same points on the zx-5n.
>
> Dan Scott
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
