SETH wrote:
>
>
> Actually, this is a situation where Stephen Gandy is
> uncharacteristically engaging in the sort speculation that Pål
> Jensen has become famous for. We are supposed to beleive some
> unnamed double secret sources.
I don't think Paal gives a monkey's butt if you believe him.
It just so happens that he seems to be *right* a lot of the time, so
many of us do believe him, knowing that there's a strong likelihood that
the story needs to be fleshed out a bit.
OTOH this limited rumor seems to be of a different sort.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
