You all can tell me if I am wrong.... I was looking on the Nikon site and
the history of the F, I know, I know..... Anyway they were discussing the F
mount and the design taking into account the mirror and how the mount had to
be designed to not interfere with it. Talks about the backfocus and the
relationship to the film plane. Does the small size of the MZ-S and let's,
say a small mirror have anything to do with a smaller veiwfinder? Maybe to
jam all the whiz-bang into it they have shorter and narrower throat on the
mirror box? Does the drive to keep the K-mount affect any of this, and what
Pentax can do design wise?
l8r,
Douglas E Harmon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://personal.mia.bellsouth.net/~genius91/
----- Original Message -----
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff
: Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
: >
: > Viewfinder:
: > Field of View: 92% vertically/horizontally
: >
: > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGH!!
: > NO, PLEASE NOT THIS!
: >
: > Gianfranco
: > (mourning for the 98% viewfinder)
:
: ... and only a .75x magnification, to boot!
: --
: Shel Belinkoff
: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: -
: This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
: go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
: visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
:
:
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
