Pal wrote:
> Absolutely. The MZ-S is indeed the MZ-1 we asked for for years. The wish for
> the MZ-1 can be destilled into small size, high built quality and not
> necessarily overloaded with features. One of the consensuses was that a pro
> built camera should not necessarily be large like the competition. Basically,
> its seems like Pentax have gone for EOS-1V built but in an MZ-sized body. A
> brilliant idea which fills a hole in the market. Th trade off is a compact
> shutter and a compact film transport but on pure feature count I'll bet the
> MZ-S surpasses the Z-1p. Also, the improved interface adress some of the
> criticism that can be directed towards the Z-1p.
I would agree with this completely. My own personal cavils aside, this
camera seems very much in keeping with Pentax and the Pentax philosophy, and
it does indeed seem to incorporate many things Pentax users have asked for
consistently over the past few years.
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
