Recently Bob Walkden wrote: > > An all-rounder is a > camera like the LX which could be used for the full range of 35mm > activities at the time. From scientific, macro and copy work, through the > point-and-shoot functionality of the day, to heavy-duty photojournalism. > > A camera which can't do all of these things is not an all-rounder. Hi Bob, You are definitely wrong. :-) An all arounder is one that is not well-enough suited to any particular job. At least, that seems to be the new-world definiton... Cheers, Boz - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Report from PMA Rofini
- Re: Report from PMA Erwin Vereecken
- Re: Report from PMA canislupus
- Re: 100% viewfinders. Was bitching and whining ab... Douglas E Harmon
- Re: 100% viewfinders. Was bitching and whinin... Gary L. Murphy
- Re: Report from PMA Shel Belinkoff
- Re[2]: Report from PMA Bob Walkden
- Re: Report from PMA Mike Johnston
- Re: Report from PMA D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
- Re: Re[2]: Report from PMA Alan Chan
- Re[4]: Report from PMA Bojidar Dimitrov
- Re[4]: Report from PMA Bob Walkden
- Re: Report from PMA SudaMafud
- Re: Report from PMA Erwin Vereecken
- Re: Re[2]: Report from PMA Alan Chan
- Re: Report from PMA Alan Chan
- Re: Report from PMA Steve Larson
- Re: Why I like LX (Was: Report from PMA) Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Why I like LX (Was: Report from PMA) Steve Larson
- Re: Why I like LX (Was: Report from PMA) Shel Belinkoff
- Re[2]: Why I like LX (Was: Report from PMA) Takehiko Ueda

